top of page

Get Your Score

Take the Assessment

The TASSE Score is a vital resource for board members, improving their ability to fulfill their fiduciary duties, especially the Duty to Prevent.

 

A higher score, highlights areas requiring improvement and strategic focus on risk mitigation.

 

A lower score indicates a thorough understanding and effective management of these risks.

Take the Assessment

Technological Threats

Technological threats include a range of cyber risks such as cyberattacks, data breaches, ransomware, unauthorized online disclosure of corporate information, and technological sabotage.

 

Additionally, organizations must be prepared to address emerging challenges posed by Deep Fake technologies, Deep Voice, and the spread of Fake News, each presenting unique risks.

​

  1. How does the organization currently monitor and evaluate cyber threats?

  2. What strategies are in place to prevent data breaches and ransomware attacks?

  3. How does the company address the risks associated with unauthorized online disclosures?

  4. What training is provided to employees to recognize and mitigate technological sabotage?

  5. How is the organization preparing for challenges posed by Deep Fake and Deep Voice technologies?

  6. What are the consequences of spreading fake news for the company?

  7. How frequently are technological risk assessments updated?

  8. What recent technological threats have the organization faced?

  9. What improvements are planned for the organization’s cybersecurity measures?

  10. How does the organization ensure technological compliance with legal standards?

​

To calculate the score for each of the five areas, you could rate the ten questions as follows:

  • 0 = risk/vulnerability is negligible

  • 1 = risk/vulnerability is moderate

  • 2 = risk/vulnerability is severe

Sum the ten question scores to get the area score (range 0–20).

Adverse Media Coverage

Negative media attention can arise when employees, executives, or board members engage in social media activities that conflict with the organization's values or policies, leading to reputational damage, eroded trust, and potential legal and financial consequences.

 

These discrepancies can lead to reputational damage, eroded trust, and potential legal and financial consequences, especially if the content shared is offensive, controversial, or unethical.

​

  1. What guidelines are in place for employees’ social media use?

  2. How does the organization respond to negative media attention?

  3. What measures are taken to align employees' public behavior with company values?

  4. How does the organization monitor the ethical content of its public communications?

  5. What was the most significant media challenge the organization faced in the past year

  6. What training do executives and board members receive about media interactions?

  7. How is the effectiveness of media response strategies assessed?

  8. What are the potential legal consequences of adverse media coverage?

  9. How does the company plan to improve its reputation management?

  10. What resources are allocated to handling media crises?

​

To calculate the score for each of the five areas, you could rate the ten questions as follows:

  • 0 = risk/vulnerability is negligible

  • 1 = risk/vulnerability is moderate

  • 2 = risk/vulnerability is severe

Sum the ten question scores to get the area score (range 0–20).

 

Supply Chain Challenges

Addressing supply chain challenges involves tackling three significant risks: child labor, modern slavery, and human trafficking.

 

Implementing ethical sourcing practices is crucial to mitigate these risks, protect human rights, and promote fair labor standards.

​

  1. What practices are in place to ensure the supply chain is free from child labor?

  2. How does the organization verify compliance with human rights standards in the supply chain?

  3. What steps are taken to address risks related to modern slavery and human trafficking?

  4. How often are supply chain audits conducted?

  5. What consequences does the company face if unethical practices are discovered in the supply chain?

  6. How transparent is the organization about its supply chain operations?

  7. What collaborations or partnerships are in place to enhance ethical sourcing?

  8. How are suppliers evaluated and selected based on ethical criteria?

  9. What training is provided to supply chain managers on ethical practices?

  10. How does the company handle violations of ethical sourcing standards?

​

To calculate the score for each of the five areas, you could rate the ten questions as follows:

  • 0 = risk/vulnerability is negligible

  • 1 = risk/vulnerability is moderate

  • 2 = risk/vulnerability is severe

Sum the ten question scores to get the area score (range 0–20).

Social Responsibility Expectations 

Organizations that prioritize superficial commitments to principles such as Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) over substantive improvements face significant risks.

​

These include severe reputational, legal, and financial consequences.

​

  1. ​How does the organization ensure its commitments to ESG and CSR are substantive rather than superficial?

  2. What specific actions have been taken to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion?

  3. How does the company measure the effectiveness of its social responsibility initiatives?

  4. What are the reputational risks associated with failing to meet social responsibility expectations?

  5. How is the impact of social responsibility initiatives communicated to stakeholders?

  6. What challenges has the organization faced in implementing these initiatives?

  7. How are employees engaged in corporate social responsibility programs?

  8. What feedback has the organization received from stakeholders regarding its social initiatives?

  9. How does the organization plan to enhance its social responsibility efforts?

  10. What legal implications has the company faced related to social responsibility?

​

To calculate the score for each of the five areas, you could rate the ten questions as follows:

  • 0 = risk/vulnerability is negligible

  • 1 = risk/vulnerability is moderate

  • 2 = risk/vulnerability is severe

Sum the ten question scores to get the area score (range 0–20).

Ethical Dilemmas Pressure

In today’s rapidly changing business environment, organizations are under constant pressure to perform ethically.

 

The risks associated with unethical behavior are significant and varied, often making unethical choices seem tempting due to the urgency to meet targets and achieve results.

​

  1. What ethical dilemmas are most prevalent within the organization?

  2. How does the organization support ethical decision-making under pressure?

  3. What training do employees receive on ethical practices and dilemmas?

  4. How are unethical behaviors identified and addressed?

  5. What systems are in place to encourage ethical behavior and whistleblowing?

  6. What consequences do employees face for unethical behavior?

  7. How does the organization ensure compliance with its ethical standards?

  8. How often are ethical standards reviewed and updated?

  9. What recent ethical challenges has the organization overcome?

  10. How does the organization promote a culture of ethics and integrity?

​

To calculate the score for each of the five areas, you could rate the ten questions as follows:

  • 0 = risk/vulnerability is negligible

  • 1 = risk/vulnerability is moderate

  • 2 = risk/vulnerability is severe

Sum the ten question scores to get the area score (range 0–20).

Scoring & Analysis

Add up all the Risk scores for each of the 5 areas.

​

  • 81-100 – Your Organization is likely unprepared for a reputational, financial, or legal threat.

  • 61-80 – Your Organization is likely somewhat prepared, but serious gaps are likely present.

  • 41-60 – Your Organization has gaps to address, but overall is reasonably prepared.

  • 21-40 – Your Organization is likely well-insulated from many threats

  • 0-20 – Your Organization is proactive and is likely quite-well prepared.

A low score may still be cause for concern if there are one or more high numbers. That suggests there are gaps to be addressed.

bottom of page