Adverse Media Coverage
10 out of 20
Semi-annual discussions on accountability are a constructive step, but more frequent and structured attention to accountability and anxiety would further enhance the board’s effectiveness and the quality of its decision-making. Limited discussion of individual accountability risks creating uncertainty around responsibilities and may introduce decision-making biases.
Possible Negative Effects
-
Infrequent focus on accountability and anxiety management prevents the board from fostering a transparent, supportive culture that strengthens governance and member well-being.
-
Without a supportive environment to address and manage anxiety, board members may experience reduced decision-making capacity, undermining overall board effectiveness.
-
Weak communication channels and a lack of transparency further hinder accountability and exacerbate anxiety among both board members and employees.
Recommendations for Improvement
-
Develop and implement clear frameworks for accountability and authority, including defined roles, responsibilities, and reporting structures.
-
Reinforce governance policies to close accountability gaps, promote transparency, and establish clear consequences for breaches.
-
Offer professional development opportunities for board members, including training on decision-making under pressure, anxiety management, and building an accountable culture.
How We Can Help
-
Provide targeted training to prepare board members to openly address accountability and anxiety challenges and apply practical solutions.
-
Deliver tailored recommendations and mitigation strategies aligned with your organization’s specific needs.
​
​