Adverse Media Coverage
5 out of 20
Your score indicates that while annual discussions on accountability and governance are beneficial, more frequent and structured attention to these issues—along with anxiety management—could significantly strengthen the board’s effectiveness and decision-making. Limited focus on individual accountability risks creating ambiguity around responsibilities and may introduce biases into board decisions.
Possible Negative Effects
-
Neglecting ongoing discussions on accountability and anxiety management prevents the board from creating a transparent, healthy culture and supporting the well-being of members.
-
A lack of structured support for managing anxiety among board members can reduce decision-making capacity and impair overall board performance.
-
Insufficient communication and transparency limit accountability and heighten uncertainty, negatively affecting both board members and employees.
Recommendations for Improvement
-
Establish clear accountability frameworks with defined roles, responsibilities, and transparent reporting lines.
-
Strengthen governance policies to close accountability gaps, improve transparency, and assign appropriate consequences for breaches of responsibility.
-
Provide professional development opportunities for board members, including training on decision-making under stress, anxiety management, and fostering a culture of accountability.
How We Can Help
-
Deliver customized training sessions to build board members’ understanding of accountability, anxiety management, and effective governance practices.
-
Offer tailored recommendations and mitigation strategies to address your organization’s specific needs and context.
​
​